Introduction - If you read the first post in this series on Guidelines for Project Management you may recall that I listed Risk Management as the number two reason for projects not meeting expectations, after Team Dynamics, the primary reason. I have described Risk Management in detail in my book “The Manager’s Guide for Leadership” and given additional details on methods for Risk Management in previous postings on this blog. Therefore I don’t address risk management further in this series. I think it’s a tossup as to the number three reason for project failures. Many would say it’s Requirements Management and I think that’s probably correct for relatively experienced project teams. I am treating Project Planning as the number three reason because in my opinion it’s more likely to be number three for inexperienced teams. And, since Project Reviews are so closely related To Project Planning I will treat them next after a series on Project Planning. This delays Requirements Management to number five, ...
<< MORE >>The Dear Abby column in my Sunday paper had an interesting question. A job seeker had experienced a number of interviews that were less than satisfying. In each example he cited the interviewer had failed to spend sufficient time with the applicant to determine if the applicant had either the training or experience for the job opening. Each example was different but typically it seemed that the interviewer had other priorities that delayed, interrupted or postponed the interview. Of course it’s possible that there was something about the applicant that ruled him out at first glance but I’ll give him the benefit of the doubt and assume that he was just the victim of bad interviewers. The reason I wish to discuss this is because in my experience far too many managers, especially young or inexperienced managers, fail to give adequate attention to recruiting. I treat this subject in detail in my book so I will make only a few comments here.
Although there are still a few great companies that recruit new college graduates and train ...
<< MORE >>I recently posted a blog explaining my number one rule for treating subordinates. At the time I also solicited input from members of the Worldwide Management Consultants group on LinkedIn. I received some excellent comments from some highly qualified consultants. In this post I have edited these comments into a more comprehensive set of rules for managers to follow in dealing with their subordinates. You will see that there is an important message in this list derived from a group of experts in management.
1. “Your subordinates do not have to work for your enterprise so treat them as volunteers”. (Thanks to Bob Cattoi, one of my former bosses and Peter Drucker, the famed management guru.)
2. This rule is closely related to rule 1.
<< MORE >>